<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Men, Women and the Bible</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.beenthinking.org/2008/12/02/men-women-and-the-bible/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.beenthinking.org/2008/12/02/men-women-and-the-bible/</link>
	<description>with Mart De Haan and Friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 04:00:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: kidmugg</title>
		<link>http://www.beenthinking.org/2008/12/02/men-women-and-the-bible/#comment-3692</link>
		<dc:creator>kidmugg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 21:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beenthinking.org/?p=2475#comment-3692</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m delighted a discussion like this one isn&#039;t bring out the pitchforks!

And I like your summary.  Very clear.

I found this post through the Gospel.com blog (of which our ministry is also an alliance member).  But I never thought they&#039;d highlight a discussion like this one! 

This past summer I posted up several posts on the &quot;mystery of submission&quot; which goes through Eph 5.  It&#039;s been a journey arriving at my present conclusions (which will likely change again tomorrow!).  Those posts are in the august archives at www.dalefincher.com.

Thanks for your work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m delighted a discussion like this one isn&#8217;t bring out the pitchforks!</p>
<p>And I like your summary.  Very clear.</p>
<p>I found this post through the Gospel.com blog (of which our ministry is also an alliance member).  But I never thought they&#8217;d highlight a discussion like this one! </p>
<p>This past summer I posted up several posts on the &#8220;mystery of submission&#8221; which goes through Eph 5.  It&#8217;s been a journey arriving at my present conclusions (which will likely change again tomorrow!).  Those posts are in the august archives at <a href="http://www.dalefincher.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.dalefincher.com</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks for your work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charis</title>
		<link>http://www.beenthinking.org/2008/12/02/men-women-and-the-bible/#comment-3684</link>
		<dc:creator>Charis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 17:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beenthinking.org/?p=2475#comment-3684</guid>
		<description>PHILLIP said:&lt;i&gt;   Hi Charis. The Prov. 31 husband has full confidence in his wife because she is fulfilling her God-ordained role as his wife.&lt;/i&gt;
&quot;Her husband has full confidence in her and lacks nothing of value.&quot; Prov 31:11

Which comes first: his confidence or her flourishing?  

 I say she flourishes BECAUSE she has chosen a Godly husband who has blessed her with freedom to flourish. 
He doesn’t keep her under his thumb, 
he doesn’t micromanage and control her, 
he doesn’t second guess her initiative, financial decisions, competence. 
He doesn&#039;t assert authority over her.
He VALUES her, cherishes her, nourishes her, trusts her.  
He has FULL CONFIDENCE in her! :)
-----&gt; He lacks nothing of value :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PHILLIP said:<i>   Hi Charis. The Prov. 31 husband has full confidence in his wife because she is fulfilling her God-ordained role as his wife.</i><br />
&#8220;Her husband has full confidence in her and lacks nothing of value.&#8221; Prov 31:11</p>
<p>Which comes first: his confidence or her flourishing?  </p>
<p> I say she flourishes BECAUSE she has chosen a Godly husband who has blessed her with freedom to flourish.<br />
He doesn’t keep her under his thumb,<br />
he doesn’t micromanage and control her,<br />
he doesn’t second guess her initiative, financial decisions, competence.<br />
He doesn&#8217;t assert authority over her.<br />
He VALUES her, cherishes her, nourishes her, trusts her.<br />
He has FULL CONFIDENCE in her! :)<br />
&#8212;&#8211;&gt; He lacks nothing of value :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wretch-like-me</title>
		<link>http://www.beenthinking.org/2008/12/02/men-women-and-the-bible/#comment-3682</link>
		<dc:creator>wretch-like-me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 16:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beenthinking.org/?p=2475#comment-3682</guid>
		<description>At this point I feel we are staining out gnats...
Where are you taking us from here, Marti?

Would anyone like to extoll the blessings of their spouse?

I have had many conversations with God about my own, however, most times he reminds me of my own short comings. When all is said and done, I am truly blessed to have a Prov. 31 wife. I wish I were more Christ-like in my attention to her. 

A question to each of us. When was the last time we &#039;publicly&#039; praised our spouse? 

You would be surprized how much it may change quietly your own perspective of how much you have to be thankful?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At this point I feel we are staining out gnats&#8230;<br />
Where are you taking us from here, Marti?</p>
<p>Would anyone like to extoll the blessings of their spouse?</p>
<p>I have had many conversations with God about my own, however, most times he reminds me of my own short comings. When all is said and done, I am truly blessed to have a Prov. 31 wife. I wish I were more Christ-like in my attention to her. </p>
<p>A question to each of us. When was the last time we &#8216;publicly&#8217; praised our spouse? </p>
<p>You would be surprized how much it may change quietly your own perspective of how much you have to be thankful?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mart De Haan</title>
		<link>http://www.beenthinking.org/2008/12/02/men-women-and-the-bible/#comment-3681</link>
		<dc:creator>Mart De Haan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 16:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beenthinking.org/?p=2475#comment-3681</guid>
		<description>Such good perspectives. Thanks to all of you. I hesitate to move on. But, once again, I hope that as I go on to post something on &quot;Should Women be Elders?&quot; Other readers will come back to see what you have all said on the more basic issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Such good perspectives. Thanks to all of you. I hesitate to move on. But, once again, I hope that as I go on to post something on &#8220;Should Women be Elders?&#8221; Other readers will come back to see what you have all said on the more basic issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: poohpity</title>
		<link>http://www.beenthinking.org/2008/12/02/men-women-and-the-bible/#comment-3680</link>
		<dc:creator>poohpity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 14:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beenthinking.org/?p=2475#comment-3680</guid>
		<description>You know while Christ is the Head of me, He is not authoritative and He has freed me from the curse of death which was what the fall was all about. He (Christ) shows me the love mentioned in 1 Cor 13 and asks me to show that to others. Now if I show that kind of love all these arguments will pass away because they will be in self seeking vanities. The strongest man I have ever known was one that did not demand his own ways but was a protector, if he thought things were out of hand quietly he would do something about it. He was a marine and never showed off his strength because he had inner strength to let everyone around him be all that they could be without his interference only encouragement. So we really do not have to show anything but love to one another because that is where the short fall is.

The only Head any of us needs is Christ that taught us how to love and that is the some total of all anyone needs because in the end it is the only thing that lasts because it is the greatest thing there is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know while Christ is the Head of me, He is not authoritative and He has freed me from the curse of death which was what the fall was all about. He (Christ) shows me the love mentioned in 1 Cor 13 and asks me to show that to others. Now if I show that kind of love all these arguments will pass away because they will be in self seeking vanities. The strongest man I have ever known was one that did not demand his own ways but was a protector, if he thought things were out of hand quietly he would do something about it. He was a marine and never showed off his strength because he had inner strength to let everyone around him be all that they could be without his interference only encouragement. So we really do not have to show anything but love to one another because that is where the short fall is.</p>
<p>The only Head any of us needs is Christ that taught us how to love and that is the some total of all anyone needs because in the end it is the only thing that lasts because it is the greatest thing there is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rdrcomp</title>
		<link>http://www.beenthinking.org/2008/12/02/men-women-and-the-bible/#comment-3679</link>
		<dc:creator>rdrcomp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 14:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beenthinking.org/?p=2475#comment-3679</guid>
		<description>Great subject (but a controversial one) and great comments.  I would just say that we need to look closer at the Genesis record where in chapter 2, verse 18 God said ...I will make a helper suitable for (literally corresponding to) him.  Of course this was prior to the fall, but I see this as the ideal:  man and woman different in many ways, but each complements and fills in the gaps of the other, but with no apparent head at this time except that the man had the authority to call her &quot;woman&quot; because she was taken out of the man.  Only after the fall, God said that the man would rule over the woman and this is part of the curse.(ch 3:16).  

I believe we still live under the curse even though Christ has redeemed us (who trust Him).  We will not have the ideal again until Christ returns for us, and until then, I believe Paul has given us detailed information about how we should live both in man/woman relationship and leadership in the church.

Yes, I and all men fall far short of the ideal, but if living by the Spirit, we can make progress in loving our wives as Christ loved the church, and gave Himself for it.  Wives can submit (not be doormats) to their husbands in a happty fulfilled way and I think that imperfectly, we return to a bit of the ideal of Genesis 2 where man and woman are complementing each other.  And if we humbly love and cherish each other, looking out for the interests of each other, I believe all of us can experience greater happiness and fullfillment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great subject (but a controversial one) and great comments.  I would just say that we need to look closer at the Genesis record where in chapter 2, verse 18 God said &#8230;I will make a helper suitable for (literally corresponding to) him.  Of course this was prior to the fall, but I see this as the ideal:  man and woman different in many ways, but each complements and fills in the gaps of the other, but with no apparent head at this time except that the man had the authority to call her &#8220;woman&#8221; because she was taken out of the man.  Only after the fall, God said that the man would rule over the woman and this is part of the curse.(ch 3:16).  </p>
<p>I believe we still live under the curse even though Christ has redeemed us (who trust Him).  We will not have the ideal again until Christ returns for us, and until then, I believe Paul has given us detailed information about how we should live both in man/woman relationship and leadership in the church.</p>
<p>Yes, I and all men fall far short of the ideal, but if living by the Spirit, we can make progress in loving our wives as Christ loved the church, and gave Himself for it.  Wives can submit (not be doormats) to their husbands in a happty fulfilled way and I think that imperfectly, we return to a bit of the ideal of Genesis 2 where man and woman are complementing each other.  And if we humbly love and cherish each other, looking out for the interests of each other, I believe all of us can experience greater happiness and fullfillment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charis</title>
		<link>http://www.beenthinking.org/2008/12/02/men-women-and-the-bible/#comment-3678</link>
		<dc:creator>Charis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 13:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beenthinking.org/?p=2475#comment-3678</guid>
		<description>Mart said:&lt;i&gt;In the Fall  when God predicted that men would rule over women it was part of the curse on sin that included weeds and thistles in the field, multiplied pain in childbirth, and death for all (Gen 3:16).&lt;/i&gt;ENDQUOTE
And
 SFDBWV said: &lt;i&gt;There are three curses here. First, woman’s sorrow will be greatly multiplied. Second,childbirth will be painful. Third, her husband shall rule over her.&lt;/i&gt;ENDQUOTE

Correction: In Genesis 3, God never pronounces CURSES upon the woman or the man.  The only CURSES God pronounces are upon the serpent and the ground.  A small detail but not trivial.  Realizing this changed my whole perspective on God&#039;s character.  (God is not like an abusive earthly father...)

Mart  referred to &quot;the prediction (not prescription) of the curse&quot;.  I would substitute &quot;consequence&quot; for &quot;curse&quot; but I agree that the consequences are predictive, not prescriptive.  IOW, it is not wrong for men to use labor saving devices which save on sweat, for women to have anesthesia during childbirth to alleviate pain, or for married couples to be equal partners.

Didn&#039;t Jesus come to restore what was lost by Adam and Eve&#039;s decision?  What does John mean when he says &quot;The reason the Son of God appeared was to destroy the devil&#039;s work.&quot; (1 Jn 3:8)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mart said:<i>In the Fall  when God predicted that men would rule over women it was part of the curse on sin that included weeds and thistles in the field, multiplied pain in childbirth, and death for all (Gen 3:16).</i>ENDQUOTE<br />
And<br />
 SFDBWV said: <i>There are three curses here. First, woman’s sorrow will be greatly multiplied. Second,childbirth will be painful. Third, her husband shall rule over her.</i>ENDQUOTE</p>
<p>Correction: In Genesis 3, God never pronounces CURSES upon the woman or the man.  The only CURSES God pronounces are upon the serpent and the ground.  A small detail but not trivial.  Realizing this changed my whole perspective on God&#8217;s character.  (God is not like an abusive earthly father&#8230;)</p>
<p>Mart  referred to &#8220;the prediction (not prescription) of the curse&#8221;.  I would substitute &#8220;consequence&#8221; for &#8220;curse&#8221; but I agree that the consequences are predictive, not prescriptive.  IOW, it is not wrong for men to use labor saving devices which save on sweat, for women to have anesthesia during childbirth to alleviate pain, or for married couples to be equal partners.</p>
<p>Didn&#8217;t Jesus come to restore what was lost by Adam and Eve&#8217;s decision?  What does John mean when he says &#8220;The reason the Son of God appeared was to destroy the devil&#8217;s work.&#8221; (1 Jn 3:8)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SFDBWV</title>
		<link>http://www.beenthinking.org/2008/12/02/men-women-and-the-bible/#comment-3677</link>
		<dc:creator>SFDBWV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 12:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beenthinking.org/?p=2475#comment-3677</guid>
		<description>My appoligies to you Mart. Because I get up early I go to bed early as well. After posting last night I turned off the computer.   However I will attempt to answer your questions now.

First I quote Genesis 3:16 &quot;Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.&quot;

There are three curses here. First, woman&#039;s sorrow will be greatly multiplied. Second,childbirth will be painful. Third, her husband shall rule over her.

This is at the very begining of our Bible. Nowhere have I found that God changed his mind and lifted the curse he put upon woman. Or man.

Secondly I quote 1 Corinthians 11:3 &quot;But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God.&quot;

I go now to Noah. God called Noah to the task of saving his family, along with all the animals. It was Noah&#039;s responsibility to obey God and save all the members of his family. Noah exacted authority over his house and all where saved.

Abraham, God called Abraham to leave his fathers house and go to a land God had in mind to give to him and all his decendants. Abraham&#039;s obediance to God brought forth the nation of Israel. This would have been quite a task without Sarah his wife. And when Sarah tried to interfere, Ishmael was the result. Abraham was the master of his &quot;house&quot; his &quot;domain&quot; all that he owned and was responsible for. Abraham had authority over his &quot;house&quot;.

Joshua 24:15, :&quot; but as for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.&quot;  Joshua was the master of his house and spoke with &quot;authority&quot; concerning it.

All throughout the Bible men have been the master of their domain. If I am to be the master of what I am responsible for then I have authority over it.

Please don&#039;t misunderstand me. In the home only Love should govern our attitude. If we are following the instruction given us concerning loving our wives enough to die for them. Then balance and harmony, not strife and anger, will prevail. 

How we pick the right mate? That is for another topic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My appoligies to you Mart. Because I get up early I go to bed early as well. After posting last night I turned off the computer.   However I will attempt to answer your questions now.</p>
<p>First I quote Genesis 3:16 &#8220;Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.&#8221;</p>
<p>There are three curses here. First, woman&#8217;s sorrow will be greatly multiplied. Second,childbirth will be painful. Third, her husband shall rule over her.</p>
<p>This is at the very begining of our Bible. Nowhere have I found that God changed his mind and lifted the curse he put upon woman. Or man.</p>
<p>Secondly I quote 1 Corinthians 11:3 &#8220;But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God.&#8221;</p>
<p>I go now to Noah. God called Noah to the task of saving his family, along with all the animals. It was Noah&#8217;s responsibility to obey God and save all the members of his family. Noah exacted authority over his house and all where saved.</p>
<p>Abraham, God called Abraham to leave his fathers house and go to a land God had in mind to give to him and all his decendants. Abraham&#8217;s obediance to God brought forth the nation of Israel. This would have been quite a task without Sarah his wife. And when Sarah tried to interfere, Ishmael was the result. Abraham was the master of his &#8220;house&#8221; his &#8220;domain&#8221; all that he owned and was responsible for. Abraham had authority over his &#8220;house&#8221;.</p>
<p>Joshua 24:15, :&#8221; but as for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.&#8221;  Joshua was the master of his house and spoke with &#8220;authority&#8221; concerning it.</p>
<p>All throughout the Bible men have been the master of their domain. If I am to be the master of what I am responsible for then I have authority over it.</p>
<p>Please don&#8217;t misunderstand me. In the home only Love should govern our attitude. If we are following the instruction given us concerning loving our wives enough to die for them. Then balance and harmony, not strife and anger, will prevail. </p>
<p>How we pick the right mate? That is for another topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ellavl</title>
		<link>http://www.beenthinking.org/2008/12/02/men-women-and-the-bible/#comment-3676</link>
		<dc:creator>ellavl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 11:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beenthinking.org/?p=2475#comment-3676</guid>
		<description>In Genesis, God said man and woman are to be one, just as Jesus and the church are to be one.  In this oneness, we are all to work toward the same end, leading mankind to Jesus and readying the world for the rapture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Genesis, God said man and woman are to be one, just as Jesus and the church are to be one.  In this oneness, we are all to work toward the same end, leading mankind to Jesus and readying the world for the rapture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DarleneJoy</title>
		<link>http://www.beenthinking.org/2008/12/02/men-women-and-the-bible/#comment-3675</link>
		<dc:creator>DarleneJoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 07:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beenthinking.org/?p=2475#comment-3675</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t have any wise comments or thoughts to add - but I want to thank everyone who has participated in this discussion. Thank you, Mart, for your well-researched and well-articulated summary of this topic which is only difficult for us right now because we live in a sin-sick world.

Thank you to everyone who has added their comments - I am SO glad to see that there is so much agreement on the most important element of love and surrender - and it BEGINS with our relationship to God. If we are truly surrendered to Him, then I believe that the proper love and surrender will be an outflow into our other human relationships.

I am a single woman - and I long to be married, but in this time of waiting for God to show me the man He has for me, I am learning about the precious and wonderful intimacy I can have with my Lord.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have any wise comments or thoughts to add &#8211; but I want to thank everyone who has participated in this discussion. Thank you, Mart, for your well-researched and well-articulated summary of this topic which is only difficult for us right now because we live in a sin-sick world.</p>
<p>Thank you to everyone who has added their comments &#8211; I am SO glad to see that there is so much agreement on the most important element of love and surrender &#8211; and it BEGINS with our relationship to God. If we are truly surrendered to Him, then I believe that the proper love and surrender will be an outflow into our other human relationships.</p>
<p>I am a single woman &#8211; and I long to be married, but in this time of waiting for God to show me the man He has for me, I am learning about the precious and wonderful intimacy I can have with my Lord.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.176 seconds -->
